Society Needs Men
Why do men exist and fulfill the role of a leader in today’s society? I ask this with anguish and pain, triggered by yet another news story of a man’s suicide caused by a wicked and malicious woman. This invoked a sadness within me that I cannot soothe with counterarguments or mathematical probabilities.
Marriage is a beautiful arrangement—a lifetime of companionship where two people build a world for their future generation, providing the opportunities and facilities they wished they had. I say "is" because this arrangement remains beautiful when it works as intended. When the two pillars of the marital institution function as they should, marriage becomes one of the greatest achievements of civilization.
Like everything else in the world, the universe, and even mathematical probabilities, things can sometimes go awry. However, we now live in a world overtaken by feminists and socialists, determined to punish men for the atrocities committed by a select few wicked individuals. In contrast, when wicked and malicious women act out, all womankind is absolved from collective blame.
If you are baffled by this hypocrisy, it gets even stranger: feminists and socialists seem eager to punish the very men who take care of them. They appear intent on biting the hand that feeds them. Feminists and socialists revel in their madness like pigs rolling in mud. When they begin to lose their grip on reality, the only course left for the benefactor is to withdraw their support and show them the consequences of their actions.
Yet, the twisted judiciary, influenced by the same feminists and socialists, is cunning enough to realize they cannot let the provider simply walk away. They bind him through legal means to ensure he continues to provide while receiving nothing in return. This provider might have continued fulfilling his role in society if only he were treated as a human being and given the respect he deserves.
There is no incentive left for men to be providers. Their positions in corporations are overtaken in the name of diversity; they are denied privileges for being protectors of society, and they receive no justice from the legal system. Consequently, men have little choice but to prioritize their own protection over that of society. No matter how much feminists want to hallucinate on their opium of equality, society cannot function without men.
If an entity is responsible for protecting and providing for the weaker members of society, it is inherently a leader and must be compensated for its contributions. Privilege is earned, not given. Historically, society has never bestowed anything on men simply for being men; privileges were granted based on the assumption that men would act as providers and protectors.
Feminists and socialists cannot survive independently—they require a larger structure to blame for their incompetence. As long as that structure exists to care for them, they will continue to leech off it. The logical solution is for the provider to sever ties with the leeches and free himself from this parasitic relationship.
Men have the power to shape any society they choose because they are the ultimate providers and protectors. They remain uncorrupted by modernity, as they are still accustomed to fighting for survival. Society offers them nothing, which makes them resilient, unlike feminists. A successful man can provide for and protect anyone, making him an asset to any community or society.
Beauty requires a benefactor because beauty relies on genetics and acts as a price for those willing to protect and provide for the woman. While this may sound crude, this transactional dynamic has always driven societal evolution. Men should demand privileges in return for their contributions. If men fight wars and shoulder burdens, they deserve virtuous women who nurture their families. Failing that, they should choose who they provide for—just as nature does.
In today’s world, dominated by feminists and socialists, ideal men have no incentive to remain benefactors. What do they receive in return? Nothing. Why, then, should they give anything? Feminists fail to grasp the nature of transactions; they believe the world must bow to their demands, and if it doesn’t, the fault lies with the world, never with them.
The wisest course for any man is to reject such people from his life. These individuals are easy to spot—their most prominent trait is their insistence that the world adhere to their opinions. Be courteous enough to listen, then reject them. Unfortunate as it is, it falls to men to shape a society that benefits them—a society that avoids its own doom. One way to achieve this is by ceasing to care for women who do not deserve it. Let them fend for themselves. Let them find men willing to kneel before them, though such men may never lead them. Without strong leaders, they will soon be lost.
Men must reward virtue and reject feminist values. If more women see the value of being virtuous, society will produce strong men and virtuous women. The judiciary will eventually have to adapt. While this transformation won’t happen overnight, even partial progress ensures men are saved from corrupt, feminist women because a feminist woman is a tragedy waiting to happen for good men.